Multiuser margin optimization in digital subscriber line (DSL) channels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents efficient multiuser margin optimization algorithms suitable for multicarrier digital subscriber line (DSL) systems using Dynamic Spectrum Management (DSM). The favorable monotonicity and fairness properties of multiuser margin are employed to formulate a box-constrained nonlinear least squares (NLSQ) problem for multiuser margin maximization, which is efficiently solved by using a scaled-gradient trust-region approach with Broyden Jacobian update. Based on this NLSQ formulation, a multiuser harmonized margin (MHM) optimization algorithm for resource allocation is developed. A Newton-Raphson method is also developed for fast margin estimation and used within the MHM. The MHM algorithm converges efficiently to a solution for the best common equal margin to all users, while explicitly guaranteeing their target rate requirements. (This is the reason for the term harmonized.) Furthermore, its predominantly distributed structure can be implemented in DSL/DSM scenarios with only Level 1 coordination. Simulation results of various cases verify the convergence to the unique optimal solution within 5-10 iterations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".