The three I's of advance care planning education: innovation, interdisciplinary and interactive
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fraser Healthy Authority (FHA) in British Columbia, Canada has been a champion and leader of Advance Care Planning (ACP) provincially and nationally. Standardized education has been an integral part of the success of this program. Two 30 min on-line modules are augmented by 6 h classroom sessions. The on-line modules are interactive and focus on the importance of communication throughout the continuum of care. Classroom sessions provide an opportunity to discuss both personal and professional experiences, enhance ACP communication skills through practice exercises and further understanding of the legal underpinning as well as the role and responsibilities of professionals and substitute decision makers. Classroom sessions are purposely interdisciplinary and typically include professionals such as respiratory therapist, spiritual care practitioners, social workers, nurses, managers, care coordinators, etc who work in various program areas such as outpatient clinics, acute, residential and primary care. This assists to illustrate the number of professionals and perspectives patients and families encounter throughout their journey of care and the need for consistent and standardized ACP approach. Though surveys and on-going feedback, students have stated FHAs education has provided a unique opportunity to learn from colleagues, enhance communication and decisional conflict skills. Students further note that following this education they were able to incorporate ACP with individuals not deemed at the ‘end of life.’ For example, students experienced an 11% increase in conversations with those individuals with chronic illnesses and a 21% increase with healthy adults. To date, 1500 healthcare professionals have completed education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".