Scaling-up from nutrient physiology to the size-structure of phytoplankton communities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In many community assemblages, the abundance of organisms is a power-law function of organism size. In phytoplankton communities, changes in size structure associated with increases in resource availability and total biomass have often been interpreted as a release from grazer control. A metapopulation-like approach is used to scale up from the individual physiological responses to environmental conditions to community size structure assuming the community taxonomic composition reflects the species pool. We show that the size scaling of cellular nutrient requirements and growth can cause (1) the power-law relationship between cell size and abundance, (2) dominance of small phytoplankton cells under oligotrophic conditions, and (3) relative increase in abundance of larger phytoplankton cells under eutrophic conditions. If physiological differences associated with the taxonomic composition of different community size fractions are considered, then the model can replicate detailed field observations such as the absence of small, slow-growing Prochlorococcus spp. and the relative dominance of large diatom species in nutrient-rich, upwelling regions of the ocean.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it