NONLINEAR VIBRATIONS OF RECTANGULAR LAMINATED COMPOSITE PLATES WITH DIFFERENT BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nonlinear vibrations of rectangular laminated composite plates with different boundary conditions are studied by using different nonlinear plate theories. In particular, numerical results for (i) the classical Von Kárman theory, (ii) the first-order shear deformation theory (SDT), and (iii) the third-order SDT are compared. The nonlinear response to harmonic excitation in the frequency neighborhood of the fundamental mode is investigated. Numerical investigation is carried out by using pseudo-arclength continuation method and bifurcation analysis. The boundary conditions of the plates are: simply supported with movable edges, simply supported with immovable edges, and clamped (CL) edges. For thick plates (thickness ratio 0.1), the strongest hardening nonlinear behavior is observed for CL plates, while the simply supported movable plates are the ones with the weakest nonlinearity among the three different boundary conditions studied here. Differences among the three nonlinear plate theories are large for thick laminated plates. For all the other cases, the first-order SDT, with shear correction factor [Formula: see text], and the higher-order SDT give almost coincident results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it