Quality of red blood cells washed using an automated cell processor with and without irradiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sterile washing of red blood cells (RBCs) and use of an additive solution permits longer postwash storage. The effect of irradiation during this extended storage time is unclear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: RBCs were washed 14 days after collection using an automated cell processor and stored in saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol. To determine how long washed and irradiated RBCs could be stored, units were irradiated 1, 4, 5, and 7 days after washing and in vitro quality was assessed. Determined limits of postwash storage time for washed and washed and irradiated RBCs were validated. Quality assessment included percent recovery, hemoglobin (Hb), hemolysis, extracellular K(+) , and adenosine triphosphate. Immunoglobulin (Ig)A levels were measured in the nonirradiated arm. RESULTS: RBCs irradiated 1 and 4 days after washing had unacceptably high hemolysis by Day 7 postwash, not meeting the acceptance criterion (<0.8% hemolysis in 98% of units with 95% confidence). Therefore, a 48-hour maximum storage time after irradiation was chosen. Storage limits tested in the validation phase were as follows: washing on Day 14 and subsequent storage for 7 days (washed RBCs) and washing on Day 14, irradiation on Day 19, and subsequent storage for 48 hours (washed and irradiated RBCs). All units met criteria for Hb, hematocrit, hemolysis, and sterility for washed RBCs. However, RBCs were washed with less than 2 L of saline, and IgA levels in 27 of 40 units were too high to be suitable for transfusion to IgA-deficient recipients. CONCLUSION: The extended expiry for washed and washed and irradiated RBCs met requirements for all indications except transfusion to IgA-deficient recipients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".