The heterodimeric structure of glucosidase II is required for its activity, solubility, and localization in vivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glucosidase II is an ER heterodimeric enzyme that cleaves sequentially the two innermost alpha-1,3-linked glucose residues from N-linked oligosaccharides on nascent glycoproteins. This processing allows the binding and release of monoglucosylated (Glc(1)Man(9)GlcNAc(2)) glycoproteins with calnexin and calreticulin, the lectin-like chaperones of the endoplasmic reticulum. We have isolated two cDNA isoforms of the human alpha subunit (alpha1 and alpha2) differing by a 66 bp stretch, and a cDNA for the corresponding beta subunit. The alpha1 and alpha2 forms have distinct mobilities on SDS-PAGE and are expressed in most of the cell lines we have tested, but were absent from the glucosidase II-deficient cell line PHA(R) 2.7. Using COS7 cells, the coexpression of the beta subunit with the catalytic alpha subunit was found to be essential for enzymatic activity, solubilization, and/or stability, and ER retention of the alpha/beta complex. Transfected cell extracts expressing either alpha1 or alpha2 forms with the beta subunit showed similar activities, while mutating( )the nucleophile (D542N) predicted from the glycoside hydrolase Family 31 active site consensus sequence abolished enzymatic activity. In order to compare the kinetic parameters of both alpha1/beta and alpha2/beta forms of human glucosidase II the protein was expressed with the baculovirus expression system. Expression of the human alpha or beta subunit alone led to the formation of active human/insect heteroenzymes, demonstrating functional complementation by the endogenous insect glucosidase II subunits. The activity of both forms of recombinant human glucosidase II was examined with a p-nitrophenyl alpha-D-glucopyranoside substrate, and a two binding site kinetic model for this substrate was shown. The K(M1-2) values and apparent K(i1-2 )for deoxynojirimycin and castanospermine were determined and found to be identical for both isoforms suggesting they have similar catalysis and inhibition characteristics. The substrate specificities of both isoforms using the physiological oligosaccharides were assessed and found to be similar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".