Establishment of normal, terminally differentiating mouse erythroid progenitors: molecular characterization by cDNA arrays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Expression profiling with cDNA arrays is an excellent tool for molecular analysis of complex processes such as terminal erythroid differentiation. The shortcomings of the currently available erythroid in vitro differentiation models, however, severely impaired the usefulness of this approach to study erythropoiesis. Here, we describe a novel, murine erythroid cell system closely corresponding to in vivo erythroid progenitors. Mortal, long‐term proliferating erythroid progenitors of fetal liver or immortal strains of p53‐deficient erythroblasts were established in culture. Both cell types proliferated in serum‐free medium and were strictly dependent on physiologically relevant cytokines and hormones, stably retaining a diploid set of chromosomes. If exposed to physiological differentiation factors (erythropoietin plus insulin), cells synchronously recapitulated the normal in vivo differentiation program to mature terminally into enucleated erythrocytes and expressed stage‐specific erythroid transcription factors in the expected temporal order. Using cDNA arrays, we found a large number of genes differentially expressed at time points during differentiation. Already 6 h after differentiation induction, 17% of the expressed genes showed significant alterations in mRNA abundance, increasing to 53% (12% up‐regulated, 41% down‐regulated genes) by 48 h. Cluster analysis of mRNA expression kinetics during differentiation identified six distinct expression patterns. All genes on the array with a known function in erythropoiesis showed the expected variations in expression. The genes identified also allowed first insights into the sequence of events within the regulatory network responsible for erythroid maturation. In mortal wild‐type as well as immortal p53 ‐/‐ erythroblasts, changes in mRNA abundance of several well‐regulated gene products was verified at the protein level. Taken together, this novel hematopoietic cell system faithfully executes essential steps of normal erythropoiesis and allows us to dissect and characterize molecular mechanisms involved in erythropoiesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".