MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2152936406 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2008.4650067

A statistical atlas-based technique for automatic segmentation of the first Heschl's gyrus in human auditory cortex from MR images

2008· article· en· W2152936406 on OpenAlexaff
Amir M. Tahmasebi, Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Conor J. Wild, Mehdi H. Moghari, Purang Abolmaesumi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Music Perception
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGyrusAuditory cortexSegmentationComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceLateralization of brain functionRight hemisphereComputer visionSpeech recognitionNeurosciencePsychologyAudiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an automatic method for the segmentation of the first transverse temporal gyrus of Heschl (HG), the morphological marker for primary auditory cortex in humans. The proposed technique utilizes a statistical anatomical atlas of the gyrus, generated from a set of training samples using principal component analysis. The training set consists of MRI data from 12 subjects with the corresponding Heschl's gyri manually labeled in each hemisphere (separate atlases were generated for each hemisphere). We used a leave-one-out approach to automatically segment Heschl's gyri in both hemispheres from the MR image data using generated atlases. We assessed the accuracy of this atlas-based technique by using it to segment the HG region from several test cases and finding the overlap between the segmented and labeled HG regions. Results demonstrated more than 75% and 83% accuracy in the extraction of the HG volumes in the left and right hemispheres, respectively. It is expected that the proposed tool can be adapted to extract other anatomical regions in the brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeuroscience and Music Perception→French-language works237,207→