MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152967426 · doi:10.1177/104063870802000109

Comparison of Bacterial Culture, Histopathology, and Immunohistochemistry for the Diagnosis of Johne's Disease in Culled Dairy Cows

2008· article· en· W2152967426 on OpenAlexaff
Shannon A. Martinson, Paul Hanna, B. O. Ikede, Jeff Lewis, Lisa Miller, Greg Keefe, Shawn McKenna

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParatuberculosisIleumHistopathologyLymph nodeImmunohistochemistryBiologyPathologyStainingLymphMicrobiological cultureImmunoperoxidaseMycobacteriumMicrobiologyBacteriaAntibodyMedicineImmunologyTuberculosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paired samples of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ileum and lymph node from 204 culled dairy cows were investigated for evidence of infection by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Of the samples, 151 were from animals that were tissue-culture positive for M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis, and 53 were from animals that were tissue and fecal culture negative. From the culture-positive animals, M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis was isolated from 78 samples of ileum and from 107 samples of lymph node. Ziehl-Neelsen acid-fast and immunoperoxidase stained slides were examined for 15 minutes each. Acid-fast organisms were identified in 7 of 78 (8.97%) and 6 of 106 (5.61%) culture-positive ileum and lymph node samples, respectively. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the same tissues identified infection in the ileum of 9 of 78 (11.54%) and in the lymph node of 5 of 106 (4.67%) culture-positive tissues. All tissues from culture-negative animals tested negative when using acid-fast and IHC staining. The sensitivity of these 2 tests in detecting M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis in culled dairy cows was not significantly different, and the tests exhibited substantial to almost perfect agreement. Both tests were much less sensitive than bacterial culture, detecting less than 6% of tissues positive compared with culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic InvestigationSame topicMycobacterium research and diagnosisFrench-language works237,207