MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153004136 · doi:10.1044/lle10.3.20

Clinical Issues: Social Skills Groups for Adolescents With Asperger Syndrome

2003· article· en· W2153004136 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jack Strulovitch, Vicky Tagalakis

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives on Language Learning and Education · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Digital Technology
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPervasive developmental disorderTrainerAutismAutism spectrum disorderDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No AccessPerspectives on Language Learning and EducationClinical Issues1 Oct 2003Clinical Issues: Social Skills Groups for Adolescents With Asperger Syndrome Jack Strulovitch and Vicki Tagalakis Jack Strulovitch Department of Psychiatry, Montreal Children’s HospitalWestmont, Quebec; Canada Google Scholar More articles by this author and Vicki Tagalakis Department of Psychiatry, Montreal Children’s HospitalWestmont, Quebec; Canada Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/lle10.3.20 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References AmanM. G., & Singh, N. N. (1986). The Aberrant Behavior Checklist. New York: Slosson Educational Publications. Google Scholar Aman, M. G., Tass, M. J., Hammer, D., & Rojahn, J. (1996). A child behavior rating form for children with developmental disabilities.Research in Developmental Disabilities, 17, 41–57. Google Scholar Constantino, J. N., Przybeck, T., Friesen, D., & Todd, R. D. (2000). Reciprocal social behavior in children with and without pervasive developmental disorders.Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 21, 2–11. Google Scholar Goldstein, A. P., & McGinnis, E. (2000). Skillstreaming the adolescent: New strategies and perspectives for teaching prosocial skills. Champaign, IL: Research Press. Google Scholar National Film Board of Canada (Producer) & Sweeney, G. (Director). (1999). A mind of your own [Motion picture]. Canada: National Film Board of Canada. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByPerspectives on Language Learning and Education10:3 (9-15)1 Oct 2003Clinical Issues: Asperger Syndrome: The Role of Speech-Language Pathologists in SchoolsRhea Paul and Dean Sutherland Volume 10Issue 3October 2003Pages: 20-22 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Oct 1, 2003 Metrics Downloaded 23 times Topicsasha-topicsleader-topicsasha-article-typesasha-sigsCopyright & Permissions© 2003 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectives on Language Learning and EducationSame topicChild Development and Digital TechnologyFrench-language works237,207