MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153051732 · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh082

A Prospective Study of Plasma C-Peptide and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Men

2004· article· en· W2153051732 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
KeywordsMedicineHyperinsulinemiaColorectal cancerInternal medicineInsulin resistanceBody mass indexConfidence intervalInsulinOncologyCancerRelative riskEndocrinologyCase-control studyAspirinLogistic regression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer and type 2 diabetes share many risk factors, and hyperinsulinemia appears to be associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. We used the concentration of plasma C-peptide (an indicator of insulin production) to determine whether insulin and insulin resistance are associated with the risk of developing colorectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study in the Physicians' Health Study. Plasma samples were collected from 14 916 cancer-free men from August 1982 through December 1984. Plasma C-peptide concentration, measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, was available for 176 case patients who developed incident colorectal cancer through December 31, 1995, and 294 age- and smoking status-matched control subjects. Information on four other insulin resistance-related factors at baseline was obtained. We used conditional logistic regression models to investigate associations. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Plasma C-peptide concentration was positively associated with age, body mass index (BMI), and number of insulin resistance-related factors, and it was inversely associated with fasting time before the blood draw, alcohol consumption, and vigorous exercise. An increased concentration of plasma C-peptide was statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (relative risk [RR] for the highest versus lowest quintile of plasma C-peptide = 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2 to 6.2; P(trend) =.047), after adjusting for age, smoking status, fasting, BMI, alcohol consumption, vigorous exercise, and aspirin assignment in the Physicians' Health Study. The association became even stronger when the analysis was further adjusted for factors related to insulin resistance other than insulin levels (RR for the highest versus lowest quintile = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.4 to 8.3; P(trend) =.02) or when data from case patients who were diagnosed during the first 5 years of follow-up were excluded (RR for the highest versus the lowest quintile = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.3 to 8.8; P(trend) =.03). Adjusting for plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and its binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) did not materially change the results. There was no apparent modification of risk by BMI, insulin resistance-related factors, or vigorous exercise. CONCLUSION: Elevated insulin production, as reflected by elevated concentrations of plasma C-peptide, may predict the risk of developing colorectal cancer, independently of BMI, factors related to insulin resistance, or levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it