Pyridoxal Isonicotinoyl Hydrazone (PIH) and its Analogs as Protectants Against Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The risk of cardiotoxicity is the main drawback of anthracycline antibiotics. However, these drugs remain among the most effective and frequently used anti cancer drugs. In this study we aimed to assess the cardioprotective effects of aroylhydrazone iron (FE) chelators: pyridoxal isonicotinoyl hydrazone (PIH) and its two analogs: salicyladehyde isonicotinoyl hydrazone (SIH) and pyridoxal o-chlorbenzoyl hydrazone (o-108). In rabbits, chronic treatment with daunorubicin (DAU) (3 mg/kg weekly for 10 weeks) induced mortality (33%) as well as left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Co-administrations of PIH (25 mg/kg, i.p.), SIH hydrochloride [1 mg/kg, iv] as well as o-108 (10 mg/kg, i.p.), fully prevented premature deaths and most of the DAU-induced functional impairments were significantly suppressed. However, when 2- to 2.5-fold higher doses of the chelators were used, they led to rather paradoxical and mostly negative results regarding both cardioprotection and overall mortality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".