MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153201519 · doi:10.1080/09593332708618735

The Stability of Hydrated Aluminium Phosphate, ALPO<sub>4</sub>·1.5H<sub>2</sub>O

2006· article· en· W2153201519 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Technology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhosphorus and nutrient management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGibbsiteDissolutionSolubilityAluminiumBoehmiteSolubility equilibriumAmorphous solidAluminium phosphateGibbs free energyMetastabilityChemistryPhase (matter)PhosphateInorganic chemistryMineralogyCrystallographyPhysical chemistryThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dissolution mechanism and stability of a synthetic hydrated aluminium phosphate, AlPO4 x 1.5H20 (AlPO4-H3) was investigated at 22 degrees C over the pH range 2.4 to 8.8. AlPO4 x 1.5H2O was found to be more soluble than the better known dihydrate (variscite, AIPO4 x 2H2O) hence proving to be metastable. This material was determined to undergo incongruent dissolution at pH around 3.0 and higher producing initially amorphous Al(OH)3 which gradually (within 30-day dissolution period) converted to the stable gibbsite phase. Upon evaluation of the experimental data with PHREEQC it was possible to calculate the solubility product ( logKsp ) and the standard Gibbs free energy of formation (deltaGf,0) for AlPO4 x 1.5H2O to be respectively-- 20.46+/-0.40 and -1980.5+/-.0 kJ mol(-1) at 22 degrees C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it