Theoretical study with rovibrational and electronic transitionmoment calculation of the ion LiCs<sup>+</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the molecular ion LiCs + the potential energy are calculated for the 39 lowest molecular states of symmetries 2 Σ + , 2 Π, 2 Δ, and Ω = 1/2, 3/2, 5/2. Using an ab initio method, the calculation is based on nonempirical pseudopotentials and parameterized [Formula: see text]-dependent polarization potentials. Gaussian basis sets are used for both atoms and spin-orbit effects are taken into account. The spectroscopic constants for 20 states are calculated by fitting the calculated energy values to a polynomial in terms of the internuclear distance r. Through the canonical functions approach, the eigenvalue E v , the abscissas of the corresponding turning points (r min and r max ), and the rotational constants B v are calculated for up to 44 vibrational levels for four bound states. Using the same approach the dipole moment functions, the corresponding matrix elements, and the transition dipole moments are calculated for the bound states (1) 2 Σ + , (2) 2 Σ + , and (1) 2 Π. The comparison of the present results with those available in literature for the ground state shows a very good agreement. Extensive tables of energy values versus internuclear distance are displayed at the following address: http://lasim.univ-lyon1.fr/allouche/licsso.html.PACS Nos.: 31.15.Ar, 31.25.–v, 31.25.Nj
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".