Theoretical study with rovibrational and electronic transitionmoment calculation of the ion LiCs<sup>+</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the molecular ion LiCs+ the potential energy are calculated for the 39 lowest molecular states of symmetries 2Σ+, 2Π, 2Δ, and Ω = 1/2, 3/2, 5/2. Using an ab initio method, the calculation is based on nonempirical pseudopotentials and parameterized [Formula: see text]-dependent polarization potentials. Gaussian basis sets are used for both atoms and spin-orbit effects are taken into account. The spectroscopic constants for 20 states are calculated by fitting the calculated energy values to a polynomial in terms of the internuclear distance r. Through the canonical functions approach, the eigenvalue Ev, the abscissas of the corresponding turning points (rmin and rmax), and the rotational constants Bv are calculated for up to 44 vibrational levels for four bound states. Using the same approach the dipole moment functions, the corresponding matrix elements, and the transition dipole moments are calculated for the bound states (1)2Σ+, (2)2Σ+, and (1)2Π. The comparison of the present results with those available in literature for the ground state shows a very good agreement. Extensive tables of energy values versus internuclear distance are displayed at the following address: http://lasim.univ-lyon1.fr/allouche/licsso.html.PACS Nos.: 31.15.Ar, 31.25.–v, 31.25.Nj
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".