First Clinical Experience With the New Once-Daily Formulation of Tacrolimus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Once-daily tacrolimus is a new oral formulation of the established immunosuppressive agent tacrolimus (Prograf, Astellas Pharma US, Inc., Deerfield, IL), which is administered twice daily. It has been approved in the European Union for prophylaxis of rejection in liver and kidney transplant recipients, where it is registered as Advagraf, and in Canada for the prophylaxis of rejection in kidney transplant recipients, and is currently under review in the United States and Japan. Studies with once-daily tacrolimus have been performed in de novo kidney and liver transplant recipients, and conversion studies have been performed in stable adult kidney and liver transplant recipients and stable pediatric liver transplant recipients, who were converted on an mg:mg basis from twice-daily tacrolimus to a single morning dose of the new formulation. Results of these studies have established the safety and efficacy of this once-daily dosing alternative. Therapeutic regimens for transplant recipients are often complex, contributing to a high incidence of medication noncompliance and its consequences of increased mortality and morbidity. The tacrolimus once-daily regimen may improve compliance while enabling the use of the same patient care strategies, total daily dose, target trough concentrations, and therapeutic monitoring techniques as currently used with the twice-a-day formulation of tacrolimus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".