MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153246406 · doi:10.1109/icmens.2003.1221971

Development of a humidity microsensor with thermal reset

2004· article· en· W2153246406 on OpenAlexaff
Abbas Ahsan, Carlos F. Lange, Walied A. Moussa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroheaterMaterials scienceCapacitive sensingHumiditySensitivity (control systems)CapacitorResistive touchscreenOptoelectronicsReset (finance)DielectricElectronic engineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present project is aimed at developing a capacitive humidity microsensor to measure humidity profiles inside the human respiratory tract. The ultimate goal of the project is to design the sensor with minimum size and with maximum sensitivity providing minimum response time. The sensor will allow determination of humidity variation in different generations of the human lung during a breath. The design process involves an appropriate simulation of the sensor to investigate the influence of several parameters on its sensitivity, and to develop a microheater that would be used to thermally reset the sensor. This sensor consists of interdigitated electrodes formed as a capacitor using aluminum as conductor and polyimide as dielectric built on a silicon substrate. For the thermal resetting, a polysilicon microheater will be built just underneath the sensor. The system should have quick absorption of moisture and ideally have a response time of less than 1 s. This specific requirement would allow for several measurements during one breath period. In order to meet these constraints a capacitive sensor was designed with a dielectric sensitive to humidity. Other parameters such as shapes of air contact surfaces, domain dimensions, properties of materials, etc. are analyzed and results are shown as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207