MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153385691 · doi:10.1142/s0218001410008391

ROTATION INVARIANT MULTIVIEW FACE DETECTION USING SKIN COLOR REGRESSIVE MODEL AND SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION

2010· article· en· W2153385691 on OpenAlexaff
Padma Polash Paul, Md. Maruf Monwar, Marina L. Gavrilova, Patrick S. P. Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Face detectionComputer scienceSupport vector machineInvariant (physics)LuminanceFace (sociological concept)Chromatic scalePrincipal component analysisFacial recognition systemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an automatic rotation invariant multiview face detection method, which utilizes modified Skin Color Model (SCM), is presented. First, Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) based hybrid models are used to classify human skin regions from color images. The novelty of the adaptive hybrid model is its ability to predict the chromatic skin color band for individual images based on calibration differences of camera and luminance condition of environment. Classified skin regions are then converted to gray scale image with a threshold based on the predicted chromatic skin color bands, which further enhances detection performance. Next, Principle Component Analysis (PCA) is applied to gray segmented regions. Face detection is carried out based on the PCA-based extracted features, along with selected features, using support vector regression. The output of this procedure is used to report the final result of face detection. The proposed method is also beneficial for the rotation invariant face recognition problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial IntelligenceSame topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207