MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153412875 · doi:10.1126/science.1248213

Order of Magnitude Smaller Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron

2013· article· en· W2153412875 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDipoleElectronElectric dipole momentMoment (physics)Order (exchange)Charge (physics)AnnihilationParticle physicsPhysics beyond the Standard ModelNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stubbornly Spherical The shape of the electron's charge distribution reflects the degree to which switching the direction of time impacts the basic ingredients of the universe. The Standard Model (SM) of particle physics predicts a very slight asphericity of the charge distribution, whereas SM extensions such as supersymmetry posit bigger and potentially measurable, but still tiny, deviations from a perfect sphere. Polar molecules have been identified as ideal settings for measuring this asymmetry, which should be reflected in a finite electric dipole moment (EDM) because of the extremely large effective electric fields that act on an electron inside such molecules. Using electron spin precession in the molecule ThO, Baron et al. (p. 269 , published online 19 December; see the cover; see the Perspective by Brown ) measured the EDM of the electron as consistent with zero. This excludes some of the extensions to the SM and sets a bound to the search for a nonzero EDM in other facilities, such as the Large Hadron Collider.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.287
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it