MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153477364 · doi:10.1354/vp.45-6-941

Unexpected Preferential Brain Metastases with a Human Breast Tumor Cell Line MDA-MB-231 in BALB/c Nude Mice

2008· article· en· W2153477364 on OpenAlexaff
Amal El-Mabhouh, Patrick N. Nation, A. Kaddoura, John R. Mercer

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Pathology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCachexiaIntracardiac injectionBreast cancerMetastasisExperimental pathologyDiseasePathologyCancer researchCancerBone metastasisCell cultureInternal medicineOncologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Animal models are useful tools to study etiology, progress, and new treatments of disease and are an approximation of human disease for experimental study. Intracardiac injection of the human estrogen-independent breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 in nude mice is a well-characterized animal model of bone metastasis mainly used to study new treatments for late-stage breast cancer. According to the published literature, this model should produce radiologically distinguishable bone tumors within 17 days after injection. Mice should develop complications such as cachexia, paraplegia, and morbidity within 28 days and require euthanasia within 35 days after injection. We report a study in which injection of MDA-MB-231 cell line led to brain rather than bone metastasis. Unexpected alterations in biological behavior are an important confounding variable in the use of tumor cell lines, and the occurrence and cause of such variants is poorly documented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary PathologySame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207