FGF-16 is released from neonatal cardiac myocytes and alters growth-related signaling: a possible role in postnatal development
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FGF-16 has been reported to be preferentially expressed in the adult rat heart. We have investigated the expression of FGF-16 in the perinatal and postnatal heart and its functional significance in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes. FGF-16 mRNA accumulation was observed by quantitative RT-PCR between neonatal days 1 and 7, with this increased expression persisting into adulthood. FGF-2 has been shown to increase neonatal rat cardiac myocyte proliferative potential via PKC activation. Gene array analysis revealed that FGF-16 inhibited the upregulation by FGF-2 of cell cycle promoting genes including cyclin F and Ki67. Furthermore, the CDK4/6 inhibitor gene Arf/INK4A was upregulated with the combination of FGF-16 and FGF-2 but not with either factor on its own. The effect on Ki67 was validated by protein immunodetection, which also showed that FGF-16 significantly decreased FGF-2-induced Ki67 labeling of cardiac myocytes, although it alone had no effect on Ki67 labeling. Inhibition of p38 MAPK potentiated cardiac myocyte proliferation induced by FGF-2 but did not alter the inhibitory action of FGF-16. Receptor binding assay showed that FGF-16 can compete with FGF-2 for binding sites including FGF receptor 1. FGF-16 had no effect on activated p38, ERK1/2, or JNK/SAPK after FGF-2 treatment. However, FGF-16 inhibited PKC-alpha and PKC-epsilon activation induced by FGF-2 and, importantly, IGF-1. Collectively, these data suggest that expression and release of FGF-16 in the neonatal myocardium interfere with cardiac myocyte proliferative potential by altering the local signaling environment via modulation of PKC activation and cell cycle-related gene expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it