MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Stochastic Decoding of LDPC Codes over GF(q)

2013· article· en· W2153505774 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow-density parity-check codeDecoding methodsAlgorithmCode wordComputational complexity theoryList decodingComputer scienceGalois theoryMathematicsBlock codeConcatenated error correction codeDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the outstanding performance of non-binary low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes over many communication channels, they are not in widespread use yet. This is due to the high implementation complexity of their decoding algorithms, even those that compromise performance for the sake of simplicity. In this paper, we present three algorithms based on stochastic computation to reduce the decoding complexity. The first is a purely stochastic algorithm with error-correcting performance matching that of the sum-product algorithm (SPA) for LDPC codes over Galois fields with low order and a small variable node degree. We also present a modified version which reduces the number of decoding iterations required while remaining purely stochastic and having a low per-iteration complexity. The second algorithm, relaxed half-stochastic (RHS) decoding, combines elements of the SPA and the stochastic decoder and uses successive relaxation to match the error-correcting performance of the SPA. Furthermore, it uses fewer iterations than the purely stochastic algorithm and does not have limitations on the field order and variable node degree of the codes it can decode. The third algorithm, NoX, is a fully stochastic specialization of RHS for codes with a variable node degree 2 that offers similar performance, but at a significantly lower computational complexity. We study the performance and complexity of the algorithms; noting that all have lower per-iteration complexity than SPA and that RHS can have comparable average per-codeword computational complexity, and NoX a lower one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it