Incremental Policy Iteration with Guaranteed Escape from Local Optima in POMDP Planning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) provide a natural framework to design applications that continuously make decisions based on noisy sensor measurements. The recent proliferation of smart phones and other wearable devices leads to new applications where, unfortunately, energy efficiency becomes an issue. To circumvent energy requirements, finite-state controllers can be applied because they are computationally inexpensive to execute. Additionally, when multi-agent POMDPs (e.g. Dec-POMDPs or I-POMDPs) are taken into account, finite-state controllers become one of the most important policy representations. Online methods scale the best; however, they are energy demanding. Thus methods to optimize finite-state controllers are necessary. In this paper, we present a new, efficient approach to bounded policy interaction (BPI). BPI keeps the size of the controller small which is a desirable property for applications, especially on small devices. However, finding an optimal or near optimal finite-state controller of a bounded size poses a challenging combinatorial optimization problem. Exhaustive search methods clearly do not scale to larger problems, whereas local search methods are subject to local optima. Our new approach solves all of the common benchmarks on which local search methods fail, yet it scales to large problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it