MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153517500 · doi:10.1109/cca.2005.1507306

Adaptive teleoperation using neural network-based predictive control

2005· article· en· W2153517500 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew C. Smith, Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeleoperationHaptic technologyTeleroboticsComputer scienceContact forcePantographArtificial neural networkInterface (matter)SimulationRobotEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMobile robot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Teleoperation systems strive to accurately render often unstructured environments to operators. However, due to the existing delays in the communication channel, transparent performance and stability are compromised. This paper presents a new class of teleoperation predictive controllers, in which the dynamics of the environment is mapped and simulated at the master side using two neural networks. The supervised network at the slave side is trained online to generate environment contact force using slave contact position and force. The master network whose gains are adaptively updated online with the transmitted slave network gains, replicate the environment force using master position. The estimated environment force is utilized in a "pseudo" two-channel force-position bilateral teleoperation control architecture. The proposed controller does not require an environment model to reflect environment dynamics for transparency. Thus, it can be used for operations on unstructured environments displaying varying nonlinear dynamic behavior. The improved performance of the new teleoperation architecture in comparison with that of a conventional two-channel force-position architecture that uses measured environment force for feedback is verified on a teleoperation test-bed consisting of two planar Twin-Pantograph haptic devices

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsFrench-language works237,207