Basis for N-acetyllactosamine-mediated inhibition of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli localized adherence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a previous article, the authors reported that exposing wild-type enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) to chemically synthesized N-acetyllactosamine glycosides covalently coupled to BSA (LacNAc-BSA) inhibited localized adherence (LA) by these organisms and also caused them to lose their bundle-forming pili (BFP), the filamentous surface appendages responsible for their LA phenotype. This effect has now been further investigated by screening a panel of LacNAc-BSA-related glycosides for their ability to inhibit EPEC LA, which revealed that LacNAc-BSA retained its status as the most effective inhibitor of EPEC LA. It was also shown that LacNAc-BSA did not cause the loss of BFP in an EPEC strain containing a non-polar mutation in the bfpF gene and, as a consequence, unable to retract its BFP. LacNAc-BSA also effectively inhibited LA of the bfpF mutant EPEC. Taken together, these observations suggest that, as well as triggering BfpF-mediated BFP retraction, LacNAc-BSA likely functions as a competitive inhibitor of EPEC binding to LacNAc-related receptors on host cells. Moreover, transmission electron microscopy revealed that LacNAc conjugated to gold nanoparticles bound specifically to BFP. This observation indicated that either the major BFP structural subunit (BfpA) itself or, possibly, an accessory protein co-assembled with BfpA into the BFP filaments, contains a LacNAc-specific EPEC adhesin. The results suggest a mechanism whereby the initial binding of EPEC to LacNAc-like receptors on host cells triggers BfpF-mediated BFP retraction. This could then expedite the intimate adherence phase of the multi-step EPEC colonization process by drawing the organisms closer to the host-cell plasma membrane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".