Levodopa response in long‐term bilateral subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson's disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is effective in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), but its effects on the levodopa response are unclear. We studied the levodopa response after long-term STN-DBS, STN-DBS efficacy and predictive value of preoperative levodopa response to long-term DBS benefit in 33 PD patients with bilateral STN-DBS. Patients were assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale preoperatively (with and without medications) and postoperatively (without medications or stimulation, with only medications or stimulation, and with both medications and stimulation). Levodopa response significantly decreased postoperatively by 31.1% at 3 years and 32.3% at 5 years, possibly related to the reduction in medication requirement, direct STN stimulation effect or PD progression. STN-DBS alone significantly improved motor scores (37.2% at 3 years and 35.1% at 5 years) and activities of daily living scores (27.1% at 3 years and 19.2% at 5 years). Anti-PD drugs were significantly reduced by 47.9% at 3 years and 39.8% at 5 years. However, the magnitude of the preoperative response to levodopa did not predict DBS benefit at 3 and 5 years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it