Cells in shearable and nonshearable regions of<i>Salmonella enterica</i>serovar Enteritidis biofilms are morphologically and physiologically distinct
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cellular morphology, exopolymer chemistry, and protein expression of shearable and nonshearable fractions of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis biofilms were examined. Biofilms were grown at a laminar flow velocity of 0.07 cm.s-1 for ~120 h, resulting in biofilms with a thickness (mean +/- SD) of 43 +/- 24 microm. An empirically determined shear-inducing flow (1.33 cm.s-1) was then applied for 5 min, effectively reducing biofilm thickness by ~70% and leaving 13 +/- 6 microm of nonshearable material and allowing fractionation of biofilm material into shearable and nonshearable regions. In situ lectin binding analyses revealed that there was no significant difference in the exopolymer glycoconjugate composition of the shearable and nonshearable biofilm zones. Length to width indices of cells from nonshearable and shearable biofilm regions as well as planktonic cells from biofilm effluent and continuous culture were determined to be 3.2, 2.3, 2.2, and 1.7, respectively, indicating that the cells in the shearable fraction were morphologically more similar to planktonic cells than the cells in the nonshearable biofilm fraction. Enhanced expression of proteins involved in cold shock response, adaptation, and broad regulatory functions (CspA, GrcA, and Hns, respectively) in cells from the shearable region as well as protein translation and modification and enhanced expression of protein involved in heat shock response and chaperonin function (DnaK) in cells from the nonshearable region revealed that the physiological status of cells in the two biofilm regions was distinct. This was also reflected in the different morphologies of cells from the two biofilm zones. Stratified patterns of cell metabolism and morphology in biofilms, obtained using shear-induced biofilm fractionation, may yield important information of how cells of deeply embedded biofilm bacteria survive imposed conditions of stress such as treatment with antimicrobial agents or antibiotics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".