Urea transporter and glutamine synthetase regulation and localization in gulf toadfish gill
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of the present study was to investigate the role of circulating cortisol and urea in the transcriptional regulation of branchial glutamine synthetase (GS), which incorporates NH(3) into glutamate to form glutamine, and the toadfish urea transporter, tUT, which is involved in urea excretion across the gill of the gulf toadfish. GS (of which there are two isoforms, LGS and GGS) and tUT mRNA expression and activity were measured in toadfish exposed to treatments that would induce variable stress responses. In addition, the role of circulating urea in tUT regulation was investigated by infusing toadfish with urea alone or in combination with intraperitoneal injection of RU486, a corticosteroid type II receptor antagonist. There was a 4.8-fold upregulation in the mRNA expression of the gill-specific GS isoform (GGS) in response to cortisol infusion and a similar upregulation in the more ubiquitous isoform (LGS). Furthermore, there was a significant 1.9-fold and 3.3-fold upregulation in the mRNA expression of the toadfish urea transporter, tUT, in response to stress through crowding or exogenous cortisol loading through infusion, respectively. In addition, tUT was found to have a urea-sensitive component to transcriptional regulation that was independent of circulating cortisol concentrations. However, the changes measured in mRNA expression of GGS, LGS and tUT did not correspond with changes in protein activity. To determine the cell type(s) involved in glutamine production and urea excretion, we attempted to localize GGS, LGS and tUT using in situ hybridization. This study is the first to show that GGS and tUT expression appear to occur in gill mitochondria-rich cells of toadfish, suggesting that these cells play a combined glutamine production and urea excretion role, which may have implications for predator avoidance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".