MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 215: Use of Chronic Medications among Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

2014· article· en· W2153767971 on OpenAlexaff
Paul T. Kocis, Guodong Liu, Dinara Makenbaeva, Jeffrey Trocio, Diana L. Velott, JoAnn Trainer, Douglas Leslie

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsDouglas College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDosingAtrial fibrillationMedical prescriptionPharmacyPillRegimenOff-label useEveningEmergency medicineInternal medicineFamily medicinePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) typically have other chronic comorbid conditions. However, little is known about the dosing regimens of medications that are prescribed to NVAF patients. Objectives: Estimate the proportion of real world NVAF patients with at least 1 CHADS 2 risk factor for stroke that may take chronic medications more than once per day. Methods: Using claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters database, which contains health insurance claims data on a national sample of privately insured individuals, we identified NVAF patients with CHADS 2 ≥ 1 during the period January 1, 2008 through September 30, 2012. Chronic medications were identified as those for which the patient had at least a 90 day supply during the study period, excluding oral anticoagulants. A “medication portfolio” was developed for each NVAF patient characterizing the chronic prescription medications taken on a regular basis. Information from the medication’s FDA approved product label and pharmacy claims data were used to add detail to each patient’s medication list. This detail included the medication name, recommended dosage and administration, and prescribed strength, quantity, and days supply. Patients were identified as taking medications multiple times per day if they were prescribed a medication with a >1 time per day dosing regimen per the product label, or one medication typically taken in the morning and another medication typically taken in the evening, or, in cases where the typical administration was unclear from the label or from clinical practice, were prescribed more than 1 pill per day, while the total daily strength of the medication was equal to an available strength of a single pill. The proportion of NVAF patients that took medications multiple times per day was then determined. Results: Overall, 324,172 NVAF patients were selected for the study. The mean age of the patients was 75.3 years and over half (54.6%) of the patients were male. Of these patients, 299,716 (92.5%) were prescribed chronic medications and 215,527 (66.5%) were identified as possibly taking medications more than once per day. Overall, among patients who were prescribed chronic medications, 71.9% were identified as possibly taking their medications more than once per day. Conclusion: Patients with NVAF typically have other chronic conditions and a large proportion of these patients may be on treatment regimens that require taking medications more than once per day.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and OutcomesSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207