Hyperphosphatemia among end‐stage renal disease patients in developing countries: A forgotten issue?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prevalence of hyperphosphatemia and increased calcium-phosphorus product has never been evaluated in a large multicenter study in a developing country. Our aim is to study the prevalence of hyperphosphatemia in 38 HD centers in Egypt (as an example of a developing country) and to correlate it with different co-morbid conditions and the patient's demographic data. This is a cross-sectional study conducted on 1005 chronic kidney disease stage 5 patients (CKD-stage 5) on HD for a period of more than 1 year in 38 dialysis centers in Egypt. All patients were receiving calcium-based salts as a phosphate binder. Hyperphosphatemia and increased calcium-phosphorus product were evaluated and correlated with different parameters including age, sex, knowledge by diet parameters, HD session duration, the frequency of HD per week, the type of dialysis membrane, the surface area of the dialyzer, dialyzer phosphorus clearance (phosphorus KoA), and the type of dialysate. Other co-morbid medical conditions and evidence of IHD were also investigated. Hyperphosphatemia was present in 69.1% of cases and a high calcium-phosphorus product was present in 30.2%. A higher calcium-phosphorus product was found among males. 83.2% of those with a poor knowledge by diet parameters had hyperphosphatemia compared with 67.6% in patients with a satisfactory knowledge by diet parameters. 72.3% of patients using a membrane with low-to-medium clearance had hyperphosphatemia, compared with 67.2% using a membrane with a high clearance. Seventy-two percent of patients with IHD were hyperphosphatemic compared with 67.6% of the non-ischemic patients. Hyperphosphatemia is a major problem in dialysis patients in developing countries, reflecting differences from developed countries regarding dietary habits, ethnic factors, dialysis quality, types of dialysis membranes, as well as economic factors hampering the use of the more expensive phosphate binders. Extended dialysis hours may be a good alternative solution in developing countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".