MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Outcomes and Care of Patients With Acute Heart Failure Syndromes and Cardiac Troponin Elevation

2013· article· en· W2153889487 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Juarez R. Braga, Jack V. Tu, Peter C. Austin, Alice Chong, John J. You, Michael E. Farkouh, Heather J. Ross, Douglas S. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Heart Failure · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityInstitute of Health Services and Policy ResearchHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreHeart and Stroke FoundationInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineHeart failureTroponinElevation (ballistics)ST elevationIntensive care medicineElectrocardiographyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponins (cTn) may be elevated among patients with acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS). However, the optimal approach to management of AHFS with elevated cTn is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the care and outcomes of 13 656 patients with AHFS seeking care in the emergency department stratified by presence (cTn+, n=1845, 13.5%) or absence (cTn-) of elevated troponin. Clinically abstracted data on patients who were admitted or discharged from the emergency department in Ontario, Canada (April 1999 to March 2001 and April 2004 to March 2007) were examined. In an exploratory 2:1 propensity-matched analysis, we examined whether early coronary revascularization (within 14 days of emergency department visit) was associated with survival, stratified by cTn status. For cTn+ AHFS, rates of coronary angiography (21.8 vs 11.4 patients/100 person-years; P<0.001) and coronary revascularization (8.8 vs 3.2 patients/100 person-years; P<0.001) were higher than cTn-. Instantaneous 30-day adjusted hazard ratios for cTn+ versus cTn- patients were 9.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.31-10.12; P<0.001) for death, 5.14 (95% CI, 4.66-5.67; P<0.001) for cardiovascular readmission, and 13.08 (95% CI, 10.95-15.62; P<0.001) for ischemic heart disease hospitalization. In propensity-matched analysis of 143 individuals with cTn+ AHFS, early coronary revascularization was associated with reduced mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.92; P=0.036) compared with those who were not revascularized. Mortality was not significantly reduced among 210 cTn- patients undergoing early coronary revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.36-1.03; P=0.065). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated cTn was associated with increased risk of death and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Highly selected cTn+ patients who underwent early coronary revascularization for obstructive coronary artery disease experienced improved survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Heart FailureSame topicAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchFrench-language works237,207