MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153901995 · doi:10.14740/jmc.v5i5.1742

Recurrent Vomiting and Epigastric Pain Attacks in an Adult Patient With Colonic Malrotation

2014· article· en· W2153901995 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yücel Üstündağ, İsmail Şerifoğlu, Öge Taşçılar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpigastric painVomitingIntestinal malrotationAbdominal painNauseaAcute pancreatitisPancreatitisSurgeryBowel obstructionPresentation (obstetrics)Radiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intestinal malrotation occurs when there is a disruption of normal embryological development of bowel. Recurrent abdominal pain due to bowel obstruction associated with adhesions is the most common clinical presentation. The majority of patients present with clinical findings in childhood. Its diagnosis is mainly based on radiologic imaging methods. Surgery is the treatment of choice for these patients. The success of treatment and prevention of complications depends on an accurate diagnosis and exact localization of colonic and intestinal anatomy. Herein, we report a 39-year-old man having intermittent attacks of nausea, vomiting and epigastric pain starting from the onset of childhood. His last attack was associated with acute pancreatitis as well. He was diagnosed with colonic malrotation on radiological examinations. Surgical resection of Ladd’s bands was successful in relieving further attacks of bowel obstruction and acute pancreatitis. We discussed this case with a short review of relevant literature. J Med Cases. 2014;5(5):267-269 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc1742w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicIntestinal Malrotation and Obstruction DisordersFrench-language works237,207