Ca <sup>2+</sup> Transients and Ca <sup>2+</sup> Waves in Purkinje Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purkinje cells contain sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) directly under the surface membrane, are devoid of t-tubuli, and are packed with myofibrils surrounded by central SR. Several studies have reported that electrical excitation induces a biphasic Ca(2+) transient in Purkinje fiber bundles. We determined the nature of the biphasic Ca(2+) transient in aggregates of Purkinje cells. Aggregates (n=12) were dispersed from the subendocardial Purkinje fiber network of normal canine left ventricle, loaded with Fluo-3/AM, and studied in normal Tyrode's solution (24 degrees C). Membrane action potentials were recorded with fine-tipped microelectrodes, and spatial and temporal changes in [Ca(2+)](i) were obtained from fluorescent images with an epifluorescent microscope (x20; Nikon). Electrical stimulation elicited an action potential as well as a sudden increase in fluorescence (L(0)) compared with resting levels. This was followed by a further increase in fluorescence (L(1)) along the edges of the cells. Fluorescence then progressed toward the Purkinje cell core (velocity of propagation 180 to 313 microm/s). In 62% of the aggregates, initial fluorescent changes of L(0) were followed by focally arising Ca(2+) waves (L(2)), which propagated at 158+/-14 microm/s (n=13). Spontaneous Ca(2+) waves (L(2)*) propagated like L(2) (164+/-10 microm/s) occurred between stimuli and caused slow membrane depolarization; 28% of L(2)* elicited action potentials. Both spontaneous Ca(2+) wave propagation and resulting membrane depolarization were thapsigargin sensitive. Early afterdepolarizations were not accompanied by Ca(2+) waves. Action potentials in Purkinje aggregates induced a rapid rise of Ca(2+) through I(CaL) and release from a subsarcolemmal compartment (L(0)). Ca(2+) release during L(0) either induced further Ca(2+) release, which propagated toward the cell core (L(1)), or initiated Ca(2+) release from small regions and caused L(2) Ca(2+) waves, which propagated throughout the aggregate. Spontaneous Ca(2+) waves (L(2)*) induce action potentials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".