MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153938496 · doi:10.2174/15665240113139990044

At the “Junction” of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Pathogenesis: The Role of Neuromuscular Junction Dysfunction in SMA Disease Progression

2013· review· en· W2153938496 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Molecular Medicine · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSMA*Spinal muscular atrophyNeuromuscular junctionPathogenesisDenervationMotor neuronAtrophyMuscle atrophyNeuroscienceMedicineNeuromuscular diseaseAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisDiseaseBiologyPathologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by mutations that reduce the level of the survival motor neuron protein (SMN) resulting in death of alpha-motor neurons, yet it is unclear why these cells are preferentially affected by a reduction in this ubiquitously-expressed protein. In mouse models of SMA, one of the earliest events detected is defects at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). Although NMJs are established at a normal frequency, there are structural as well as functional perturbations and a lack of maturation of the primitive synapse. These early defects are followed by loss of the NMJ, denervation of the muscle and onset of muscle atrophy. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of the contribution of NMJ dysfunction in SMA disease pathogenesis, and also provide an overview of therapies currently under preclinical and clinical development for treatment of SMA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it