MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153998175 · doi:10.1189/jlb.0207126

Expression and translocation of fluorescent-tagged p21-activated kinase-binding domain and PH domain of protein kinase B during murine neutrophil chemotaxis

2007· article· en· W2153998175 on OpenAlexafffund
Marco Magalhaes, Fei Zhu, Helen Sarantis, Scott D. Gray‐Owen, Richard P. Ellen, Michael Glogauer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Leukocyte Biology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsBiologyCell biologyChemotaxisTransfectionGreen fluorescent proteinKinaseMolecular biologyCell cultureBiochemistryReceptorGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neutrophils are key cells of the innate immune system; they are terminally differentiated and therefore difficult to genetically manipulate and study in vitro. In the present study, we describe a protocol to transiently express two fluorescent markers, the PH domain of protein kinase B fused to red fluorescent protein and the p21-activated kinase-binding domain fused to a yellow fluorescent protein, in primary neutrophils. Using this approach, we are able to achieve a transfection efficiency of approximately 30%. The expression of the transfected probes occurred within 2 h and allowed for real-time monitoring of intermediates in key neutrophil activation pathways at the leading edge of migrating cells. We describe here a transfection protocol for primary neutrophils, which preserves fMLP-mediated cell polarization and cytoskeleton reorganization with simultaneous accumulation of PI-3K products and active Rac at the leading edge. The visualization and analysis of transfected fluorescent markers in primary neutrophils are a powerful technique to monitor chemotaxis signaling pathways in real time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Leukocyte BiologySame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207