A continuum‐to‐atomistic bridging domain method for composite lattices
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The bridging domain method is an overlapping domain decomposition approach for coupling finite element continuum models and molecular mechanics models. In this method, the total energy is decomposed into atomistic and continuum parts by complementary weight functions applied to each part of the energy in the coupling domain. To enforce compatibility, the motions of the coupled atoms are constrained by the continuum displacement field using Lagrange multipliers. For composite lattices, this approach is suboptimal because the internal modes of the lattice are suppressed by the homogeneous continuum displacement field in the coupling region. To overcome this difficulty, we present a relaxed bridging domain method. In this method, the atom set is divided into primary and secondary atoms; the relative motions between them are often called the internal modes. Only the primary atoms are constrained in the coupling region, which succeed in allowing these internal modes to fully relax. Several one‐ and two‐dimensional examples are presented, which demonstrate improved accuracy over the standard bridging domain method. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it