MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154099584 · doi:10.1002/ceat.200800387

Kinetics of Catalytic Ozonation of Methyl <b><i>tert</i></b>‐Butyl Ether in the Presence of Perfluorooctyl Alumina

2009· article· en· W2154099584 on OpenAlexaff
Amanollah Ebadi, Sirous Shafiei

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering & Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisChemistryMethyl tert-butyl etherKineticsOzoneEtherReaction mechanismReaction rateChemical kineticsBatch reactorHeterogeneous catalysisOrganic chemistryInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this work, the kinetics of heterogeneous ozonation of methyl tert‐butyl ether (MTBE) in the presence of perfluorooctyl alumina (PFOAL) catalysts is presented. Activity of the PFOAL catalysts in ozonation reactions of MTBE was studied in a batch reactor over the temperature range of 25 to 40 °C. The results show that PFOAL is an effective catalyst for enhancing the molecular mechanism of ozone reactions. For a catalyst concentration of 5 g/L, the contribution of the rate of heterogeneous catalytic reaction in the total reaction rate is about 50 %, 75 %, and 85 % at the reaction temperatures of 25 °C, 30 °C, and 40 °C, respectively. Kinetic studies showed that the chemical reaction of ozone and MTBE is the controlling step in this catalytic system. The quasi‐homogeneous kinetic model proved to be an appropriate approach in modeling the heterogeneous reaction of ozone with MTBE on PFOAL catalysts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Engineering & TechnologySame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207