Huntingtin Interacting Protein 1 Induces Apoptosis via a Novel Caspase-dependent Death Effector Domain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Huntington disease is a devastating neurodegenerative disease caused by the expansion of a polymorphic glutamine tract in huntingtin. The huntingtin interacting protein (HIP-1) was identified by its altered interaction with mutant huntingtin. However, the function of HIP-1 was not known. In this study, we identify HIP-1 as a proapoptotic protein. Overexpression of HIP-1 resulted in rapid caspase 3-dependent cell death. Bioinformatics analyses identified a novel domain in HIP-1 with homology to death effector domains (DEDs) present in proteins involved in apoptosis. Expression of the HIP-1 DED alone resulted in cell death indistinguishable from HIP-1, indicating that the DED is responsible for HIP-1 toxicity. Furthermore, substitution of a conserved hydrophobic phenylalanine residue within the HIP-1 DED at position 398 eliminated HIP-1 toxicity entirely. HIP-1 activity was found to be independent of the DED-containing caspase 8 but was significantly inhibited by the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-x(L), implicating the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis in HIP-1-induced cell death. Co-expression of a normal huntingtin fragment capable of binding HIP-1 significantly reduced cell death. Our data identify HIP-1 as a novel proapoptotic mediator and suggest that HIP-1 may be a molecular accomplice in the pathogenesis of Huntington disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".