Integration of growth hormone gene constructs in transgenic strains of coho salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus kisutch</i>) at centromeric or telomeric sites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Very little information is currently available regarding the sites of integration of transgenes in genetically engineered fish. We examined the chromosomal location of growth hormone gene constructs containing GH1 in three different strains of transgenic coho salmon produced by microinjection into pronuclei of fertilized eggs. The constructs were labeled and used as probes in fluorescence in situ hybridization experiments on chromosome preparations from the M77, MT5750A, and H3D0474 strains of transgenic coho salmon. The constructs were localized at 1-3 different sites in different strains. In the M77 strain the construct was found at a single centromeric site on a medium-sized metacentric chromosome, while in the MT5750A strain, the construct was found at a single telomeric site on the short arm of chromosome pair 21, a subtelocentric chromosome with a large band of repetitive DNA on the short arm. In the H3D0474 strain, the construct was found at telomeric sites on the long arms of three metacentric chromosomes that appear to represent one pair of homologous chromosomes and one chromosome containing the homeologous long arm (recently duplicated chromosome arm) corresponding to the long arm of the first pair. This suggests transfer of the construct may have occurred by homologous and homeologous crossing over. All of the constructs incorporated at restricted sites characterized by the presence of tandem DNA repeats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".