MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154166437 · doi:10.1061/41016(314)239

Structures Using Uncurved or Minimally Curved Tensioned Fabric Membranes

2008· article· en· W2154166437 on OpenAlexaff
Craig G. Huntington

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2008 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsThornhill Medical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPondingDeflection (physics)MembraneCurvatureStructural engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most tensioned fabric structures employ membranes that have support geometry resulting in anti-clastic curvature. A lesser number of structures have synclastic forms maintained by air pressure. Fabric membranes with little or no curvature must deflect substantially to resist out of plane loads, and their inefficient load resistance may result in high membrane stresses and heavy loads on the supporting cables and rigid elements. Large deflections may also result in conditions where membrane slope reaches zero under rain or snow loading, with ponding resulting. Uncurved or minimally curved surfaces are therefore generally avoided in design. Architectural, economic, or other reasons create many instances in which uncurved or minimally curved fabric membrane surfaces are desirable. Fabric roofs employing flat membranes can be economical, beautiful, and practical in certain conditions and with appropriate attention to the special design problems that are associated with them. The paper presents case studies of several recently built structures that employ uncurved or minimally curved fabric membranes. It explores the rationale behind the selection of flat forms, and considers how the special risks or costs associated with inefficient load resistance, high deflection, and the threat of ponding were addressed. The structures studied are recently constructed designs engineered by the author.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructures Congress 2008Same topicStructural Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207