MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154208380 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2007.378837

FPGA Implementation of LDPC Decoders Based on Joint Row-column Decoding Algorithm

2007· article· en· W2154208380 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceLow-density parity-check codeAlgorithmParallel computingSequential decodingList decodingGate arrayColumn (typography)Joint (building)ThroughputRouting (electronic design automation)Computer hardwareEmbedded systemConcatenated error correction codeComputer networkEngineeringWirelessTelecommunicationsBlock code

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a joint row-column decoding algorithm for the decoding of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. Simulation indicates that the proposed algorithm improves the performance in both the waterfall region and the error floor region. By combining row processing with column processing, the joint row-column decoding algorithm reduces the storage requirements of extrinsic messages and avoids memory conflicts and routing congestion during the exchanges of extrinsic messages. Implementation results into field programmable gate array (FPGA) devices indicate that the proposed algorithm reduces the hardware costs by 30% and increases the decoding speed by a factor of four. A 40-parallel decoder attains a throughput of 2 Gbits/sec by using up to 20 % of the generic logic resources in a Xilinx XC4LX160 device

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207