MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154277349 · doi:10.1109/23.940160

Fast PET image reconstruction based on SVD decomposition of the system matrix

2001· article· en· W2154277349 on OpenAlexafffund
Vitali Selivanov, Roger Lecomte

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSingular value decompositionIterative reconstructionScannerImage qualityImage resolutionTruncation (statistics)AlgorithmMatrix decompositionMatrix (chemical analysis)Radon transformTomographic reconstructionInverse problemRegularization (linguistics)Computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPhysicsImage (mathematics)Mathematical analysisMaterials scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data filtering based on matrix pseudo-inverse is a well-known but not yet appreciated means of tomographic image reconstruction. In the present work, the feasibility of image reconstruction based on singular value decomposition (SVD) of the system matrix for animal two-dimensional positron emission tomography is demonstrated. Analytic detector response function accounting for the noninvariant spatial system response is explicitly included into the system matrix. Regularization of the SVD-based solution with the singular spectrum truncation (TSVD solution) derived from spatial resolution analysis is proposed. TSVD reconstruction is fast except for the matrix decomposition step, which is performed once for a given scanner geometry. Reconstructed image quality and quantitation are compared to those obtained with filtered backprojection (FBP) and iterative maximum likelihood technique. With the constant progress of computing power, TSVD image reconstruction may become a viable alternative to FBP for routine clinical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207