Topographic Controls on Production and Deposition of Tidal Cool-Water Carbonates, Uzes Basin, SE France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We document an example of a cool-water carbonate deposit interpreted as a flood-tidal delta formed during sea-level fall in the Uzès basin (French Miocene foreland basin). In the Miocene it was a peripheral basin connected to the open sea by a narrow, 15-km-long seaway. The studied Uzès Formation is a 50-m-thick tidal bioclastic carbonate body, formed at the junction between the Uzès basin and the seaway. It is composed dominantly of rhodalgal packstones that are interpreted to have been produced inside the basin. However, most of the deposit was built out by bidirectional hydraulic dunes, suggesting that accumulation of carbonate grains was not controlled by production but rather by tidal currents. The deposit is thickest and coarsest grained, and exhibits the larger dunes at the inlet of the seaway, where currents are expected to have been fastest. The deposit is thinner, finer-grained, and more bioturbated away from the inlet toward the basin; that is interpreted as a result of a decrease of current velocity due to flow expansion. The main deposit exhibits a general upward increase in thickness and grain size of cross-beds, together with a decrease of faunal diversity (from bivalve-rich to rhodalgal facies), consistent with progressive tidal flow acceleration in the seaway resulting from sea-level fall. Lime mud is pervasive in the matrix of even the highest-energy facies. This suggests that one cannot draw any average correlation between permeability and architecture of the deposit. Also, this could favor the observed early marine diagenesis of the deposit and give it a high preservation potential in the stratigraphic record.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".