MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154362436 · doi:10.1586/17476348.2015.1098536

Risk of respiratory syncytial virus infection in preterm infants: reviewing the need for prevention

2015· review· en· W2154362436 on OpenAlexaff
Haben Y. Abraha, Krista L. Lanctôt, Bosco Paes

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Respiratory Medicine · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVirusIntensive care medicineRespiratory systemPalivizumabBronchiolitisVirologyPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Premature infants are at substantial risk for a spectrum of morbidities that are gestational age dependent. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is most common in the first two years of life with the highest burden in children aged <6 months. Preterm infants ≤35 weeks' gestation are handicapped by incomplete immunological and pulmonary maturation and immature premorbid lung function with the added risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Superimposed RSV infection incites marked neutrophilic airway inflammation and innate immunological responses that further compromise normal airway modeling. This review addresses the epidemiology and burden of RSV disease, focusing on the preterm population. Risk factors that determine RSV-disease severity and hospitalization and the impact on healthcare resource utilization and potential long-term respiratory sequelae are discussed. The importance of disease prevention and the evidence-based rationale for prophylaxis with palivizumab is explored, while awaiting the development of a universal vaccine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.495
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Respiratory MedicineSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207