MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154380528 · doi:10.1897/03-438

A food web bioaccumulation model for organic chemicals in aquatic ecosystems

2004· article· en· W2154380528 on OpenAlexaff
Jon A. Arnot, Frank A. P. C. Gobas

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioaccumulationFood webAquatic ecosystemEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryEcosystemAquatic environmentFood chainEcologyChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study examines a new bioaccumulation model for hydrophobic organic chemicals in aquatic food webs. The purpose of the model is to provide site-specific estimates of chemical concentrations and associated bioconcentration factors, bioaccumulation factors, and biota-sediment accumulation factors in organisms of aquatic food webs using a limited number of chemical, organism, and site-specific data inputs. The model is a modification of a previous model and incorporates new insights regarding the mechanism of bioaccumulation derived from laboratory experiments and field studies as well as improvements in model parameterization. The new elements of the model include: A model for the partitioning of chemicals into organisms; kinetic models for predicting chemical concentrations in algae, phytoplankton, and zooplankton; new allometric relationships for predicting gill ventilation rates in a wide range of aquatic species; and a mechanistic model for predicting gastrointestinal magnification of organic chemicals in a range of species. Model performance is evaluated using empirical data from three different freshwater ecosystems involving 1,019 observations for 35 species and 64 chemicals. The effects of each modification on the model's performance are illustrated. The new model is able to provide better estimates of bioaccumulation factors in comparison to the previous food web bioaccumulation model while the model input requirements remain largely unchanged.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations518
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Toxicology and ChemistrySame topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207