Neurological Complications of PCR-Proven<i>M. pneumoniae</i>Infections in Children: Prodromal Illness Duration May Reflect Pathogenetic Mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The spectrum of neurologic disease attributable to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children is incompletely understood in part because of limitations of microbiologic diagnostic methods. Our objective was to characterize the neurologic complications of M. pneumoniae in children using stringent diagnostic criteria. METHODS: All children admitted to the Hospital for Sick Children over a 16-year period with acute neurologic manifestations and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed M. pneumoniae infection were eligible for inclusion. Cases were categorized as definite, probable, or possible according to strength of evidence implicating M. pneumoniae. Children with underlying noninfectious neurologic conditions or an alternative infectious cause were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 365 children had M. pneumoniae detected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or respiratory tract by PCR, 42 (11.5%) of whom had neurologic disease attributable to M. pneumoniae. The most common clinical syndromes were encephalitis (52%), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (12%), transverse myelitis (12%), and cerebellar ataxia (10%). Two distinct disease patterns were observed, one with a prolonged prodrome (≥7 days), respiratory manifestations, an immunoglobulin M (IgM) response in peripheral blood, and detection of M. pneumoniae in the respiratory tract, but not the CSF, and one with a brief (<7 days) or no prodrome, less frequent respiratory manifestations and IgM response, and detection of M. pneumoniae in the CSF, but not the respiratory tract. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis of two separate pathogenetic mechanisms for M. pneumoniae-associated neurologic disease, one related to direct infection of the central nervous system and one indirect, likely immunologically mediated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".