Solid-State <sup>23</sup>Na NMR Study of Sodium Lariat Ether Receptors Exhibiting Cation−π Interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Noncovalent cation-pi interactions are important in a variety of supramolecular and biochemical systems. We present a 23Na solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) study of two sodium lariat ether complexes, 1 and 2, in which a sodium cation interacts with an indolyl group that models the side chain of tryptophan. Sodium-23 SSNMR spectra of magic-angle spinning (MAS) and stationary powdered samples have been acquired at three magnetic field strengths (9.4, 11.75, 21.1 T) and analyzed to provide key information on the sodium electric field gradient and chemical shift (CS) tensors which are representative of the cation-pi binding environment. Triple-quantum MAS NMR spectra acquired at 21.1 T clearly reveal two crystallographically distinct sites in both 1 and 2. The quadrupolar coupling constants, CQ(23Na), range from 2.92 +/- 0.05 MHz for site A of 1 to 3.33 +/- 0.05 MHz for site B of 2; these values are somewhat larger than those reported previously by Wong et al. (Wong, A.; Whitehead, R. D.; Gan, Z.; Wu, G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 10551) for NaBPh4, but very similar to the values obtained for sodium metallocenes by Willans and Schurko (Willans, M. J.; Schurko, R. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5144). We conclude from the 21.1 T data that the spans of the sodium CS tensors are less than 20 ppm for 1 and 2 and that the largest components of the EFG and CS tensors are non-coincident. Quantum chemical calculations of the NMR parameters substantiate the experimental findings and provide additional insight into the dependence of CQ(23Na) on the proximity of the indole ring to Na+. Taken together, this work has provided novel information on the NMR interaction tensors characteristic of a sodium cation interacting with a biologically important arene.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".