MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154411001 · doi:10.1139/x01-219

Pathogens and insects in a pristine forest ecosystem: the Sierra San Pedro Martir, Baja, Mexico

2002· article· en· W2154411001 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Patricia E. Maloney, David M. Rizzo

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPEST analysisBiologyHost (biology)Diameter at breast heightBark (sound)EcologyForestryBotanyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We determined the incidence of pathogens and insects across mixed-conifer stands in the Sierra San Pedro Martir (SSPM) of northern Baja, Mexico, to assess the role of pests in a pristine forest ecosystem. We also determined the spatial distribution of the two most common pests, mistletoe, Phoradendron pauciflorum Torrey, and the fir engraver, Scolytus ventralis LeConte, of white fir (Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl.) across a 25-ha grid to assess spread and what host and pest variables were related. In these open parklike stands the mean tree density was 160 trees/ha, of which 58% were trees >20 cm diameter at breast height (DBH). In these low-density, mixed-aged stands we found that mixed-conifer species were well represented with no one species being completely dominant. Percent cumulative mortality for the SSPM was 12.7%, ranging from 2 to 24%, with the greatest amount of mortality occurring in the larger size classes, trees [Formula: see text]50 cm DBH. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that 78% of the mortality we observed was explained by pathogens and bark beetles (r 2 = 0.78, P = 0.0001, F = 84). Mean pest incidence for Jeffrey pine (Pinus jeffreyi Grev. & Balf. in A. Murray), white fir, and sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana Dougl.) was 21, 88, and 2%, respectively. We found a number of relationships among host and pest variables, as well as a pathogen– insect interaction, and across the SSPM we found that nonhost species may be interfering in certain host–pest interactions. Spatial patterns from the 25-ha grid survey revealed that both P. pauciflorum and S. ventralis incidence were widespread. Phoradendron pauciflorum showed no spatial structure across the 25 ha but S. ventralis showed some degree of spatial structuring across the survey area. We also found that mistletoe severity was negatively correlated with regeneration of white fir. In pristine forests, pathogens and insects influence mortality and regeneration success, affecting stand structure and composition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207