MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154452838

Drawing on Diversity in the Arts Education Classroom: Educating Our New Teachers.

2005· article· en· W2154452838 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kari Veblen, Carol Beynon, Selma Landen Odom

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPraxisPedagogyCurriculumSociologyDiversity (politics)Multicultural educationInclusion (mineral)MulticulturalismThe artsCultural pluralismCultural diversityTeacher educationSocial sciencePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article, the authors discuss their attempts to make antiracist multiculturalism a reality in their students’ future classrooms. They note that the literature is replete with examples of what not to do in trivializing curriculum, and they attempt here to take theory into praxis/practice by exposing and describing their strategies for engaging their students in antiracist multicultural understandings and activities. Multiple diverse narratives in the classrooms of Canadian schools provide countless opportunities for arts educators to bring community into the classroom. However, research continues to show that new teachers still come predominantly from the dominant culture and will likely continue dominant traditions unless interventions occur that cause them to reflect on what and how they teach (Beynon, Veblen, & Bradford, in review). Realities of schooling and the crosscurrents of race, gender, and class compel educators to rethink culturally responsive curriculum. In this paper we describe the strategies that each of us used with prospective arts teachers in our university classrooms to educate them about issues of diversity and the necessity for inclusion. The purpose of this paper, then, is to explore means of bringing pedagogical

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0320.016
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0020.016
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207