MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154544601 · doi:10.1002/jssc.201100764

Enhancing concentration and mass sensitivities for liquid chromatography trace analysis of clopyralid in drinking water

2011· article· en· W2154544601 on OpenAlexaff
Binghe Gu, Brian S. Meldrum, Terry McCabe, Scott T. Phillips

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Separation Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Canadian institutionsDow Chemical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromatographyElutionChemistrySolid phase extractionClopyralidDetection limitAnalyteSample preparationExtraction (chemistry)SolventMass spectrometryMethanol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A theoretical treatment was developed and validated that relates analyte concentration and mass sensitivities to injection volume, retention factor, particle diameter, column length, column inner diameter and detection wavelength in liquid chromatography, and sample volume and extracted volume in solid-phase extraction (SPE). The principles were applied to improve sensitivity for trace analysis of clopyralid in drinking water. It was demonstrated that a concentration limit of detection of 0.02 ppb (μg/L) for clopyralid could be achieved with the use of simple UV detection and 100 mL of a spiked drinking water sample. This enabled reliable quantitation of clopyralid at the targeted 0.1 ppb level. Using a buffered solution as the elution solvent (potassium acetate buffer, pH 4.5, containing 10% of methanol) in the SPE procedures was found superior to using 100% methanol, as it provided better extraction recovery (70-90%) and precision (5% for a concentration at 0.1 ppb level). In addition, the eluted sample was in a weaker solvent than the mobile phase, permitting the direct injection of the extracted sample, which enabled a faster cycle time of the overall analysis. Excluding the preparation of calibration standards, the analysis of a single sample, including acidification, extraction, elution and LC run, could be completed in 1 h. The method was used successfully for the determination of clopyralid in over 200 clopyralid monoethanolamine-fortified drinking water samples, which were treated with various water treatment resins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Separation ScienceSame topicAnalytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsFrench-language works237,207