Induction of Epididymal Boar Sperm Capacitation by pB1 and BSP-A1/-A2 Proteins, Members of the BSP Protein Family1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A family of proteins designated BSP-A1, BSP-A2, BSP-A3, and BSP-30-kDa, collectively called BSP (bovine seminal plasma) proteins, constitute the major protein fraction of bull seminal plasma. BSP proteins can stimulate sperm capacitation by inducing cholesterol and phospholipid efflux from sperm. Boar seminal plasma contains one homologous protein of the BSP family, named pB1; however, its physiological role is still unknown. In the current study, we report a novel method to purify pB1 from boar seminal plasma by chondroitin sulfate B-affinity chromatography and reverse-phase-high performance liquid chromatography. We also studied the effect of pB1, BSP-A1/-A2, and whole boar seminal plasma on boar sperm capacitation. Boar epididymal sperm were washed, preincubated in noncapacitating medium containing pB1 (0, 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 microg/ml), BSP-A1/-A2 (0 or 20 microg/ml) proteins, or whole seminal plasma (0, 250, 500, or 1000 microg/ml), then washed and incubated in capacitating medium. Acrosomal integrity was assessed by chlortetracycline staining. The status of sperm capacitation was evaluated by the capacity of sperm to undergo the acrosome reaction initiated by the addition of the calcium ionophore, A23187. The pB1 and BSP-A1/-A2 proteins increased epididymal sperm capacitation as compared with control (sperm preincubated without proteins). This effect reached a maximum level at 10 microg/ml pB1 and at 20 microg/ml BSP-A1/-A2 (2.3- and 2.2-fold higher than control, respectively). Whole boar seminal plasma did not induce sperm capacitation. In addition, pB1 bound to boar epididymal sperm and was lost during capacitation. These results indicate that BSP proteins and their homologs in other species induce sperm capacitation in a similar way.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".